Most maintenance problems in property management are not maintenance problems — they are tracking problems. The faucet gets fixed eventually. What gets lost is the record: who reported it, when, what it cost, and whether the owner was told.
A maintenance request needs a status that is visible to everyone who touches it — reported, assigned, in progress, completed — not a status that exists only in one person's head. It needs an owner: a specific vendor or team member, not "someone will get to it." And it needs a cost that flows automatically into the property's financial record, so it shows up on the owner statement without someone re-entering it from a receipt three weeks later.
A workflow that holds up under volume
The workflow that holds up under volume looks like this: a request comes in — from a guest, a cleaner, or a routine inspection — and becomes a task immediately, with a photo if there is one. It gets assigned to a vendor or staff member with a due date. When it is marked complete, the cost is logged against the property and the owner is notified automatically if your policy calls for that. Nothing depends on someone remembering to forward a text message.
Why group texts fail at scale
Group texts fail at scale because they have no state. A photo of a broken water heater sent to a group chat is indistinguishable, three days later, from a photo of a broken water heater that already got fixed. A tracked task with a status field solves that by design, not by discipline — which matters because discipline is the first thing that breaks when a portfolio grows.
Run your properties on one system.
Bookings, owner statements, and maintenance connected, not stitched together.
Create your account